Tim has litigated several constitutional law questions, including voting rights and civil rights cases. Recent cases:
In 2002, Montana voters approved an amendment to the Montana Constitution that set out new requirements for placing citizen initiatives and constitutional amendments on the ballot, requiring petitions to be signed 5% of the voters of 50% of the state’s counties for citizen initiatives and 10% of the voters of 50% of the state’s counties for constitutional amendments. The Montana Legislature also passed a law requiring disclosure of the identity of paid signature gatherers. On behalf of MontPIRG, Tim argued that these provisions violated the US Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Because the populations of Montana’s counties are so vastly uneven, the Court found that Montana’s county distribution requirements violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause because Montanans living in a sparsely-populated county would have a disproportionate effect on qualifying initiatives. Moreover, the State of Montana stipulated that the statute requiring disclosure of the identity of paid signature gatherers was unconstitutional, and removed it from Montana’s laws.
As a result of this lawsuit, the signature distribution requirement is based on legislative districts, which have a roughly equal number of voters, and the identity of signature gatherers, whether paid or volunteer, does not have to be disclosed.
In 2011, Montana had a statute, MCA §76-2-205(6) that allowed either 1) 40% of the property owners, or 2) property owners representing at least 50% of agricultural or forest land, to veto a zoning resolution. At the request of homeowners who feared that a large land owner would build a gravel pit by their homes near Lolo, Montana, the Missoula County Commissioners established a zoning district that prevented gravel mining. Landowners who represented over 50% of the zoning district (who indicated they planned to build a gravel pit) then vetoed the zoning resolution. On behalf of the homeowners, Tim argued that the veto power of the large landowners was unconstitutional because it delegated legislative power out of the hands of the elected commissioners and into the hands of a select group of landowners. The veto statute gave the large landowners the final say on establishment of a zoning resolution. The Montana Supreme Court held that under the Constitution, the elected body must have the final determination, not unelected landowners, and determined that the veto provision was unconstitutional.
Todd v. Baker, CV 10127-M-DWM, 2012 WL 1999529 (D. Mont.)
John Todd was out socializing in Kalispell on his 22nd birthday in 2007. Walking home, he paused to sit and rest. Kalispell police officers stopped to check him out and approached John from the side and rear and did not announce themselves as police officers. When one officer spoke, John jumped up and began to run. One of the officers tasered John, and John fell, struck his head, and suffered a brain injury. The court ruled that the officers had “qualified immunity” under federal law because tasers had not been categorized as inappropriate force in 2007 when this incident happened. The Ninth Circuit ruled after 2007 that tasers are an “intermediate use of force” and officers must have a sound basis for using a taser on a citizen. On appeal, the case settled.
Ferguson v. Ottosen, CV-12-16-M-DLC (D. Mont.)
Jeff Ferguson, an Irag vet, was having a PTSD episode in his home in Kalispell. An acquaintance who was concerned called Ferguson’s mental health provider, who alerted the police. The police came to Ferguson’s home and tasered him. Kalispell made an offer of judgment in the case and the case settled for the amount of the offer of judgment.
In re: National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation, 671 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 2011).
Fuller v Verizon, CV-06-77-M-DWM (D. Mont.)
Dolberg v. AT&T, CV-06-78-M-DWM (D. Mont.)
On behalf of all Montana customers of Verizon and AT&T, Tim filed class action suits against telecommunications providers who had participated in turning over their clients’ electronic communications to the National Security Agency without a warrant. All similar cases throughout the country were consolidated in Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in San Francisco. While the MDL cases were being litigated, Congress passed an amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) that provided retroactive immunity to the telecommunications providers. The MDL court and the Ninth Circuit held that the retroactive immunity was constitutional and that citizens had no recourse to stop the warrantless collection of their communications.
Reed v. Lieurance, CV-13-17-BU-SEH (D. Mont.)
Tony Reed was parked next to a road trying to observe a bison hazing operation in Gallatin County, Montana. A Gallatin County deputy cited Reed for obstruction. Reed challenged the constitutionality of his arrest, arguing that there was no probable cause to arrest him for attempting to record a government operation. The Montana federal district court ruled for Gallatin County on all counts, and this matter is on appeal before the Ninth Circuit.